By Frances Gray
How do philosophy and analytical psychology give a contribution to the mal-figuring of the female and girls? Does Luce Irigaray's paintings signify the opportunity of individuation for girls, an get away from masculine projection and an asserting re-figuring of ladies? And what could individuation for ladies entail?
This paintings postulates a singular and special dating among Carl Jung and Luce Irigaray. Its principal argument, that an ontologically diverse female id located in women's embodiment, women's family tree and a women's divine is feasible, develops and re-figures Jung's concept of individuation when it comes to an Irigarayan woman-centred politics. Individuation is re-thought as a politically charged factor targeted round sex-gendered distinction focussed on a critique of Jung's notion of the feminine.
The booklet outlines Plato's belief of the female as ailment and argues that this belief is located in Jung's proposal of the anima female. It then argues that Luce Irigaray's paintings demanding situations the thought of the female as disease. Her mimetic adoption of this figuring of the female is an immediate attack on what should be understood as a culturally dominant Western knowing. Luce Irigaray argues for a female divine to be able to version a fantastic female simply because the masculine divine versions a masculine excellent. In making her claims, Luce Irigaray, the e-book argues, is increasing and elaborating Jung's notion of individuation.
Jung, Irigaray, Individuation brings jointly philosophy, analytical psychology and psychoanalysis in suggesting that Luce Irigaray's perception of the female is a severe re-visioning of the open-ended probabilities for individual expressed in Jung's concept of individuation. This clean perception will intrigue teachers and analysts alike in its exploration of the various traditions from which Carl Jung and Luce Irigaray speak.
Read Online or Download Jung, Irigaray, Individuation: Philosophy, Analytical Psychology, and the Question of the Feminine PDF
Similar Feminism books
Fleeing Nazi Germany in 1936, the Schwarts immigrate to a small city in upstate big apple. right here the father—a former highschool teacher—is demeaned through the single activity he can get: gravedigger and cemetery caretaker. whilst neighborhood prejudice and the family's personal emotional frailty provide upward push to an unthinkable tragedy, the gravedigger's daughter, Rebecca heads out into the USA.
The book of Germaine Greer's the feminine Eunuch in 1970 used to be a landmark occasion, elevating eyebrows and ire whereas making a surprise wave of popularity in girls worldwide with its steadfast statement that sexual liberation is the main to women's liberation. at the present time, Greer's searing exam of the oppression of ladies in modern society is either an incredible ancient checklist of the place we now have been and a surprisingly correct treatise on what nonetheless is still completed.
Heyes' monograph in feminist philosophy is at the connection among the belief of "normalization"--which in step with Foucault is a method or strength of keep watch over that homogenizes a population--and the gendered physique. Drawing on Foucault and Wittgenstein, she argues that the major photograph of the self--a photograph that presupposes an "inner" middle of the self that's expressed, safely or now not, via the outer body--obscures the relationship among modern discourses and practices of self-transformation and the forces of normalization.
There has been a second within the Nineteen Seventies whilst intercourse was once what mattered such a lot to feminists. White middle-class ladies seen intercourse as imperative to either their oppression and their liberation. younger women began to converse and write concerning the clitoris, orgasm, and masturbation, and publishers and the scoop media jumped on the chance to disseminate their perspectives.
Additional info for Jung, Irigaray, Individuation: Philosophy, Analytical Psychology, and the Question of the Feminine
Four Lacan 2002: 810–11. five Rockmore 2003: 104, 106. 6 See, for instance, Butler 1999b: passim – see specially 242 word 18; Kojève 1996; Taylor 1975; Fox 2005. 7 For a dialogue of ‘modern inwardness’ and the inner/outer metaphor see Taylor (1989: 127–98). The separation of internal and outer is usually crucial to Lacan’s reflect degree. See Lacan (2002: 97). I speak about the reflect degree in bankruptcy four. eight Jung 1968a: 525–626. See, for instance, omit X’s being caught to the earth (identification with the opposite) (527); the complementariness of inferior and stronger capabilities (interdependence of self-consciousness and the opposite) (541); ‘letting pass offers the subconscious the chance it's been awaiting’ (the life/death fight starts off) (563). nine See, for instance, Jung 1969: 828ff; 1968a: 229ff; 1967: 195–7. 10 See, for instance, Jung 1968a: 1, 259, 489ff; 1969: 351ff; 358ff; 1977: 1069. eleven Ellenberger’s account (Ellenberger 1970) of the invention and background of the subconscious is excellent in this rating, as is Nagy’s account of Jung’s dating to nineteenth-century philosophy and early psychology (1991). 12 Luce Irigaray’s essays ‘Le style feminin’ and ‘Les Trois Genres’ (in Irigaray 1987) are later translated as ‘The lady Gender’ and ‘The 3 Genders’ (in Irigaray 1993a). ‘The 3 Genders’ additionally looks in Irigaray 1991b). Luce Irigaray says that she has a ‘project in engaged on style in discourse: style as index and mark of the subjectivity and moral accountability of the speaker. style isn't really in truth basically whatever to do with body structure, biology or deepest lifestyles, with the mores of animals or the fertility of vegetation. It constitutes the irreducible differentiation inner to the human race [‘genre humain’]. style represents the positioning of the nonsubstitutable positioning of the I and the you and in their modalities of expression. should still the variations among the I and the you disappear, so do call for, thank you, appeals, questions. ’ in fact, one in every of Luce Irigaray’s claims is that there's no female style as issues presently stand: there quite isn't any I (feminine) and no you (masculine) for the reason that I (feminine) is a scarcity within the simply current symbolic, the masculine symbolic. So there is not any call for or thank you or allure, or questions, not likely. So, for ladies to have style will be for girls to absorb an issue place as girls, and this necessitates the making of a brand new symbolic/imaginary. additionally, as Carolyn Burke issues out in her essay Translation Modified’, ‘genre’ in French capacity either ‘gender’ and ‘genre’ (or philosophical ‘kind’). See Burke, Schor and Whitford (1994). thirteen Margaret Whitford claims that the advent of a female divinity into the symbolic is considered one of Luce Irigaray’s goals. yet this misses the purpose approximately ‘a female Divine’ and fails to articulate what I see as a peculiarity of Luce Irigarayean distinction. See Whitford (1991: 141). 14 this can be major simply because, as I shall argue in bankruptcy 7, the sex/gendered nature of the symbolic/imaginary has profound implications for the collective subconscious which we take to be sex/gender-neutral.