Download E-books Rhetoric, Modality, Modernity PDF

By Nancy S. Struever

Since antiquity, philosophy and rhetoric have usually been forged as opponents, with the previous usually lauded as a look for logical fact and the latter frequently disparaged as empty speech. yet during this erudite highbrow background, Nancy S. Struever stakes out a declare for rhetoric because the extra effective kind of inquiry.

Struever perspectives rhetoric throughout the lens of modality, arguing that rhetoric’s guiding curiosity in what's possible—as against philosophy’s problem with what's necessary—makes it an excellent instrument for figuring out politics. cutting edge readings of Hobbes and Vico enable her to reexamine rhetoric’s function within the historical past of modernity and to make attention-grabbing connections among thinkers from the classical, early glossy, and smooth sessions. From there she turns to Walter Benjamin, reclaiming him as an exemplar of modernist rhetoric and a valuable determine within the lengthy heritage of the shape. Persuasive and perceptive, Rhetoric, Modality, Modernity is a singular rewriting of the background of rhetoric and a heady exam of the explanations, concerns, and flaws of up to date inquiry.

Show description

Read or Download Rhetoric, Modality, Modernity PDF

Best Philosophy books

Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong

This identify provides an perception into ethical skepticism of the twentieth century. the writer argues that our every-day ethical codes are an 'error conception' according to the presumption of ethical evidence which, he persuasively argues, do not exist. His refutation of such proof relies on their metaphysical 'queerness' and the statement of cultural relativity.

Hume: A Very Short Introduction

Hume's "naturalist" method of a large choice of philosophical subject matters ended in hugely unique theories approximately notion, self-identity, causation, morality, politics, and faith, all of that are mentioned during this stimulating creation via A. J. Ayer, himself one of many 20th century's most crucial philosophers.

Enlightenment Contested: Philosophy, Modernity, and the Emancipation of Man 1670-1752

Jonathan Israel provides the 1st significant reassessment of the Western Enlightenment for a iteration. carrying on with the tale he started within the best-selling Radical Enlightenment , and now focusing his consciousness at the first 1/2 the eighteenth century, he returns to the unique resources to provide a groundbreaking new point of view at the nature and improvement of crucial currents in smooth proposal.

The Philosopher's Touch: Sartre, Nietzsche, and Barthes at the Piano (European Perspectives: A Series in Social Thought and Cultural Criticism)

Well known thinker and admired French critic François Noudelmann engages the musicality of Jean-Paul Sartre, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Roland Barthes, all of whom have been novice piano avid gamers and acute fans of the medium. notwithstanding piano enjoying was once a very important paintings for those thinkers, their musings at the topic are mostly scant, implicit, or discordant with every one philosopher's oeuvre.

Additional resources for Rhetoric, Modality, Modernity

Show sample text content

32. E. Stump has illumined the complicated, but efficacious relatives among themes and rhetoric, issues and dialectic and common sense within the Classical and medieval history; “Dialectic and Aristotle’s Topics,” in Dialectic and Its position within the improvement of Medieval good judgment (Ithaca, manhattan, 1989), 11–30. 33. Cicero, Topica, trans. H. M. Hubbell (Cambridge, MA, 1960), II. 6. See Noeda, “Proofs, Arguments, Places,” a hundred and five: themes are outlined variously as “seating, starting place of argument, locations the place arguments live, are hid, drawn forth; as ‘reservoirs of ideas,’ slots or ‘cells’ the place arguments are saved. ” 34. B. Cassin, “Philosophia enim simulari potest, eloquentia non potest: ou, le masque et l’effet,” Rhetorica thirteen (1995), 105–24. 35. O. chook, “The culture of the Logical themes: Aristotle to Ockham,” magazine of the background of rules 23 (1962), 307–23. 36. W. Jaeger, Paideia: The beliefs of Greek tradition, trans. G. Highet (Oxford, 1965), II. c. three, c. 6; cf. HN, seventy five. notes to pages 27–34 137 37. Dockhorn, overview of Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode, cites Julius Victor on rhetorical enthymemes as “. . . oratio apud homines, qui non recondite disputationum subtilitate, sed communi sensu universa percipient,” 172. 38. Theophrastus, from Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle’s Topica I; in Theophrastus of Ephesus: assets for His existence and Writings, ed. W. Fortenbaugh et al. (Leiden, 1992), 122A. 39. simply so, Cicero sees the dialectician as extra fascinated by precision in generality, yet he sees the orator as inevitably, constantly engaged with the actual case, the speculation or causa; see M. Leff, “The themes of Argumentative Invention in Latin Rhetorical idea from Cicero to Boethius,” Rhetorica 1 (1983), 23–42. Leff issues out the rhetorical use can moderate neither universal ideals and styles of inference nor the distinct situations of use. And therefore Hobbes trying to movement at the maximum point of generalization whereas responding to the civil struggle, “Ad lectores,” De cive. forty. this can be in fact Dumouchel’s argument; for Hobbes, passions aren't intimate states of the topic, Émotions, forty four. forty-one. Dumouchel, “Voir et craindre un lion,” Rue Descartes 12–13 (May 1995), ninety eight; for Hobbes “les processus cognitifs ne peuvent jamias être parfaitement libres des passions,” ninety nine. forty two. This Aristotelian phenomenology of listening applies to all argument: see B. Cassin and M. Narcy, Le choice du sens; le livre Gamma de los angeles Metaphysique d’Aristote (Paris, 1989), 1006a25–26, 185–86. See additionally the Rhetoric, 1359a19; 1400b34–35; additionally Theophrastus from Dem. Eloc. , 222, in Fortenbaugh et al. , eds. , Theophrastus of Eresus: assets for His existence, Writings, idea, and impact (Leiden, 1992), 696. forty three. A. Moss, revealed Commonplace-Books and the constitution of Renaissance suggestion (Oxford, 1996). forty four. Brunschwig makes the purpose that rhetorical manuals themselves pressure innovation: rhetorical texts are prospective/generative vs. dialectic’s retrospective/ prescriptive, “Rhétorique et dialectique,” eighty one. forty five. Schaffer, “Hobbes’ actual discussion” (Appendix), Leviathan and the AirPump, 348.

Rated 4.82 of 5 – based on 43 votes