By Bruce Bawer
Thousands of individuals around the globe have been surprised and horrified while a madman named Anders Behring Breivik trigger a bomb in downtown Oslo after which attacked a political summer time camp at the island of Utoya, gunning down defenseless youngsters whereas calling out “Gotcha!” as if he have been enjoying a game. within the instant aftermath of the assault, ahead of the killer’s identification used to be recognized, a few humans leaped to the realization that this was once one more act of Islamic terrorism. while it grew to become out that the killer used to be a local Norwegian—the writer of a rambling manifesto within which he defined himself as a latest Knight Templar protecting the values of Christian civilization—the left wing cultural elite in Europe and the USA jumped to delegitimize critics of Islam by means of falsely and cynically linking them to Breivik.
One of these critics was once American author Bruce Bawer, writer of diverse books concerning the possibility of Islamic radicalism and a kind of whose works have been pointed out in Breivik’s manifesto. Bawer has lived in Oslo for a few years and has written widely at the demanding situations of immigration and the unwanted effects of radical Islam on liberal societies. he's additionally a vocal critic of the left wing cultural elite that seeks to lessen this probability and promotes as an alternative a imaginative and prescient of a harmonious multicultural society in response to tolerance and mutual recognize. regrettably, such “tolerance” doesn't expand to critics of Islam or multiculturalism, who're sometimes categorised nativists and fascists through participants of the left wing elite.
The left commonly denies or downplays the non secular causes of Islamic terrorists whereas insisting that “right wing rhetoric” creates a “climate of hate” which inevitably results in violence. therefore the multicultural left in Europe and the USA strove to color Breivik as a pro-Israel Christian terrorist whose insane activities have been inspired if now not outright stimulated through conservative authors who warn opposed to the upcoming Islamization of Europe. those that had criticized Islam, despite the fact that legitimately involved they could be with the denial of easy human rights and person liberties inside of Muslim groups, have been deemed formally anathema. They have been Islamophobes—racists, bigots, extremists. They have been the chance. They have been the hazard. they'd fertilized the soil within which the mass assassin had grown. This crusade of vilification was once waged not only within the ecu press yet on American blogs and within the pages of the recent York Times.
In the hot Quislings, Bruce Bawer explores the world-wide reaction to Breivik’s rampage, from the Norwegian cultural elite to Atlantic blogger Andrew Sullivan and the hot York Times’ Roger Cohen. He presents a desirable portrait of the left-wing cultural elite in Norway—revealed to be the birthplace of political correctness—and exhibits how they've got develop into apologists for radical Islam. Bawer additional argues that they're the heirs of Vidkun Quisling, the Norwegian fascist who administered Norway less than the heel of the Nazi regime. And he explains how those that oppose open debate and search to manage the dialog approximately Islam pose the best hazard to liberal society.
Read Online or Download The New Quislings: How the International Left Used the Oslo Massacre to Silence Debate About Islam PDF
Similar Islam books
Carrying on with her trip from a deeply spiritual Islamic upbringing to a publish at Harvard, the bright, charismatic and controversial New York Times and Globe and Mail #1 bestselling writer of Infidel and Nomad makes a robust plea for a Muslim Reformation because the purely option to finish the horrors of terrorism, sectarian battle and the repression of girls and minorities.
A landmark new translation of the sacred textual content of Islam in a sublime deluxe editionLiterally "the recitation," The Qur'an is thought of in the Muslim religion to be the infallible observe of God. Tarif Khalidi, the most important student of Islamic heritage and religion, presents a clean English translation that captures the startling, beautiful poetry of 1 of the world's such a lot cherished spiritual texts.
Fundamentalism is obvious because the significant risk to global peace at the present time, a end most unlikely to disregard because the occasions in manhattan on September eleven, 2001. yet what does "fundamentalism" particularly suggest? because it was once coined through American Protestant evangelicals within the Twenties, using the time period "fundamentalist" has increased to incorporate a various diversity of radical conservatives and ideological purists, no longer all non secular.
The enterprise of Islam has been commemorated as a magisterial paintings of the brain in view that its ebook in early 1975. during this three-volume research, illustrated with charts and maps, Hodgson strains and translates the historic improvement of Islamic civilization from prior to the beginning of Muhammad to the center of the 20th century.
Extra resources for The New Quislings: How the International Left Used the Oslo Massacre to Silence Debate About Islam
Implicit within the elite view of those issues, evidently, is that standard everyone is too silly to be relied on with democracy. after all, in its contempt for the belief of presidency of the people—as good as its distaste for American-style liberty—the eu elite is especially a lot in sync with the Islamists, simply because it used to be, ahead of the autumn of the Berlin Wall, greatly in sync with Soviet communism. So issues stood as of July 21, 2011. after which alongside got here Anders Behring Breivik. After numerous acts of terror within the identify of Allah, one Norwegian guy had taken violent motion opposed to multiculturalism—and thereby passed the multiculturalists a outstanding chance to regain the facility that had slipped clear of them lately and to conquer those that had eroded their authority. With a unmarried day’s evil paintings, Breivik supplied the multicultural left with the skill to wrest again their power—by linking their political rivals to the mass assassin. the area has infrequently noticeable such callousness so cynically disguised as a delicate problem for social concord. The multiculturalists acted—and with lightning pace. They misplaced no time in turning Breivik’s activities to their virtue, overtly conserving that simply because he had hostile multiculturalism and the Islamization of Europe, all people else who held such perspectives additionally bore a percentage of the accountability for his massive actions—unless they repented now. the one right reaction to Breivik, the Norwegian humans have been informed in television interviews and newspaper op-eds, used to be to reject feedback of Islam and settle for multiculturalism wholeheartedly. in simple terms in that means may they really defeat Breivik—and merely in that manner may possibly they eliminate any suspicion that they, too, harbored the gruesome prejudices that contaminated the murderer’s soul. It used to be an absurd line of argument, but—to an grand extent—it labored. to appreciate why, we have to examine the categories of principles on which Norwegians were nurtured through the smooth period. 3 weeks after Breivik’s atrocities, on August 12, an editorial in Dagsavisen paid tribute to the Norwegian thinker Arne Næss, who died in 2009 at age ninety-six. Næss used to be a rarity between philosophers, in that his was once, in the course of his lifetime, a loved ones identify in his personal nation. greater than that, he used to be largely cherished (or no less than was once represented within the media as being generally beloved), for he used to be obvious as having articulated the authentically Norwegian view of life—good-hearted, great-spirited, nature-loving, and supremely unpretentious (and pleased with it). it can no longer be unfair to name him “the thinker of niceness. ” within the Dagsavisen article in query, Truls Gjefsen recalled with admiration that in the Nazi profession, Næss had publicly criticized the Norwegian Resistance for stirring up hatred opposed to Germans. rather than treating the enemy as, um, the enemy, Næss insisted, resistance warring parties could be “polite,” “friendly,” and “respectful” to the occupiers, and may try and positioned themselves within the Nazis’ footwear. in the end, Nazis have been humans, too.