By Steven D. Levitt, Stephen J. Dubner
Now in Paperback—the New York Times bestseller—and stick to as much as the progressive bestsellers Freakonomics and SuperFreakonomics—with a brand new writer Q&A.
With their trademark combination of pleasing storytelling and unconventional research, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner take us within their notion approach and train us all the best way to imagine a section extra productively, extra creatively, extra rationally. In Think Like A Freak, they give a blueprint for a wholly new option to clear up difficulties, even if your curiosity lies in minor lifehacks or significant worldwide reforms. the subjects variety from enterprise to philanthropy to activities to politics, all with the objective of retraining your mind. alongside the way in which, you’ll examine the secrets and techniques of a jap hot-dog-eating champion, the explanation an Australian healthcare professional swallowed a batch of risky micro organism, and why Nigerian electronic mail scammers make some degree of claiming they’re from Nigeria.
Levitt and Dubner it seems that see the realm like not anyone else. you can now too. by no means prior to have such iconoclastic thinkers been so revealing—and a lot enjoyable to read.
Read or Download Think Like a Freak: The Authors of Freakonomics Offer to Retrain Your Brain PDF
Best Sociology books
A probing account of the commemorated position of older ladies in old matriarchal societies restores to modern girls an energizing image of self-value, strength, and appreciate.
Sociology: a quick advent invitations scholars to take sociology with them of their day-by-day lives. This winning franchise contains powerful insurance of race, ethnicity, and globalization. Paired with a private and adaptive studying adventure, scholars learn how to follow sociology’s 3 theoretical frameworks to the area round them.
A visionary social philosopher unearths how the addition of 1 hundred million americans through midcentury will remodel the way in which we are living, paintings, and prosper. In stark distinction to the remainder of the world's complex international locations, the U.S. is transforming into at a checklist expense, and, in response to census projections, could be domestic to 400 million americans by means of 2050.
C. Wright generators is healthier remembered for his hugely acclaimed paintings The Sociological mind's eye, during which he set forth his perspectives on how social technology will be pursued. Hailed upon ebook as a cogent and hard-hitting critique, The Sociological mind's eye took factor with the ascendant faculties of sociology within the usa, calling for a humanist sociology connecting the social, own, and historic dimensions of our lives.
Additional resources for Think Like a Freak: The Authors of Freakonomics Offer to Retrain Your Brain
Herley wish to see this attempt broadened by means of automation. “What you will want is to construct a chatbot,” he says, “a computing device application that may have a talk with you. There are examples out there—there’s a chatbot psychotherapist, for example. You’d are looking to construct anything that engages the scammer at the different part, pulls him in a section. You don’t have to retain him speaking for 20 round-trip e-mails, but when at any time when he has to install a few attempt, that’d be nice. ” In different phrases, Herley wish to see a sensible laptop programmer faux to be dumb which will outwit a wise scammer who's additionally pretending to be dumb with a view to discover a sufferer who's, if no longer dumb, then tremendous gullible. Herley’s chatbot may flood a scammer’s approach with fake positives, making it almost very unlikely to pick a true sufferer. you could give some thought to it as carpet-bombing the scammers’ gardens with thousands upon thousands of weeds. We too suggestion it would be great to assault a few undesirable men prior to they have been capable of assault blameless humans. In SuperFreakonomics, released in 2009, we defined an set of rules that we outfitted with a fraud officer at a wide British financial institution. It was once designed to sift via trillions of information issues generated through thousands of financial institution shoppers to spot strength terrorists. It was once encouraged via the abnormal banking habit of the 11th of September terrorists within the usa. one of the key behaviors: • They tended to make a wide preliminary deposit after which progressively withdraw funds through the years, with out regular replenishment. • Their banking didn’t mirror basic residing costs like hire, utilities, assurance, etc. • a few of them often despatched or got overseas cord transfers, however the quantity necessarily fell lower than the reporting restrict. Markers like those are infrequently sufficient to spot a terrorist, or perhaps a petty legal. yet via beginning with them, and culling extra major markers from the British banking info, we have been capable of tighten the algorithm’s noose. And tight it needed to be. think that our set of rules grew to become out to be ninety nine percentage exact at predicting given financial institution buyer was once attached to a terrorist staff. That sounds beautiful solid until eventually you think about the implications of a false-positive price of one percentage in a case like this. Terrorists are quite infrequent within the uk. Let’s say there are 500 of them. An set of rules that's ninety nine percentage exact could flush out 495 of them—but it is going to additionally wrongly establish 1 percentage of the opposite humans within the facts. around the complete inhabitants of the U. okay. , approximately 50 million adults, that may translate into a few 500,000 blameless humans. What could occur in case you hauled in part one million non-terrorists on terrorism fees? you may brag all you sought after approximately how low a false-positive fee of one percentage is—just examine the fake positives that Nigerian scammers need to take care of! —but you’d nonetheless have loads of offended humans (and, most likely, complaints) in your fingers. So the set of rules needed to be towards ninety nine. 999 percentage actual. That’s what we strove for as we loaded the set of rules with marker upon marker.