Written by means of prime specialist reporters and classroom-tested at faculties of journalism, pondering truly is designed to impress dialog concerning the matters that form the creation and presentation of the scoop within the twenty-first century. those case reviews depict real-life moments while humans operating within the information needed to make serious judgements. referring to questions of craft, ethics, festival, and trade, they conceal various topics--the advertisement imperatives of newsroom tradition, criteria of verification, the contest of private and non-private pursuits, together with the query of privacy--in various key episodes: Watergate, the Richard Jewell case, John McCain's 2000 presidential crusade, and the Columbine capturing, between others.
Read or Download Thinking Clearly: Cases in Journalistic Decision-Making PDF
Similar Journalism books
A riveting selection of literary journalism through the bestselling writer of the fitting hurricane, capped off brilliantly by means of a brand new Afterword and a well timed essay approximately war-torn Afghanistan -- an excellent eyewitness record concerning the Taliban's defeat in Kabul -- new to booklet shape. Sebastian Junger has made a area of expertise of bringing to existence the drama of nature and human nature.
For the genuine bibliophile and design-savvy publication lover, this is the subsequent set of Penguin's celebrated nice principles sequence by means of a few of history's such a lot leading edge thinkers. Acclaimed for his or her awesome and chic package deal, every one quantity encompasses a detailed type-driven layout that highlights the bookmaker's artwork. delivering nice literature and nice layout at nice costs, this sequence is perfect for readers who are looking to discover and delight in the good rules that experience formed our international.
In an age of proliferating media and information resources, who has the facility to outline fact? whilst the dominant media declared the lifestyles of WMDs in Iraq, did that make it a truth? this day, the "Social net" (sometimes often called net 2. zero, groupware, or the participatory internet) -- epitomized via blogs, viral movies, and YouTube -- creates new pathways for truths to emerge and makes attainable new strategies for media activism.
From the acclaimed writer of the knowledge and Chaos, a mind-bending exploration of time go back and forth: its subversive origins, its evolution in literature and technological know-how, and its impression on our realizing of time itself. Gleick's tale starts off on the flip of the 20 th century with the younger H. G. Wells writing and rewriting the glorious story that turned his first e-book, a global sensation, The Time computing device.
Extra info for Thinking Clearly: Cases in Journalistic Decision-Making
Lewinsky. Mr. Nelvis, who's assigned to a small kitchen-pantry that has entry to the Oval workplace and adjoining learn, supplied extra testimony to the grand jury on Wednesday. Mr. Nelvis approached mystery provider team of workers and defined having visible Mr. Clinton with Ms. Lewinsky within the Oval workplace, in keeping with one individual accustomed to the development. This individual wouldn't symbolize Mr. Nelvis’s description of precisely what he observed or while. Mr. Nelvis is very important to Mr. Starr simply because not like mystery carrier brokers, who're chargeable for the safety of the president, there's no bar to his testimony. Mr. Nelvis’s testimony can be major if it may be corroborated. one of the questions Mr. Starr and his employees are trying to reply to is whether or not Mr. Clinton testified falsely in a deposition or even if he mentioned a plan within which Ms. Lewinsky would supply fake testimony in a lawsuit. may still Mr. Starr boost adequate facts that that happened, he may possibly convey legal fees of perjury or obstruction of justice. in the course of a deposition Mr. Clinton gave final month within the sexual harassment lawsuit filed opposed to him by means of Paula Jones, Mr. Clinton used to be requested even if he had ever met by myself with Ms. Lewinsky. in accordance with someone accustomed to Mr. Clinton’s testimony, the president spoke back that Ms. Lewinsky had met with Betty Currie, his own secretary. the 2 members accustomed to Mr. Nelvis’s testimony acknowledged that he said getting better tissues with lipstick and different stains on them after the alleged assembly among Mr. Clinton and Ms. Lewinsky and that he disposed of them within the kitchenpantry. The contributors acknowledged Mr. Nelvis, who has served within the White condo for greater than 15 years, knowledgeable the key provider of the assembly among Mr. Clinton and Ms. Lewinsky simply because he “was individually indignant” by means of it. the truth that Mr. Nelvis has testified to the grand jury used to be first said through ABC information final evening. Mr. Nelvis didn't reply to a number of calls to his place of dwelling Wednesday, and his lawyer didn't respond to messages left at his workplace by means of a reporter. www. FreeRepublic. com, February four, 2000. Copyright © 1998 Dow Jones & corporation, Inc. All Rights Reserved. The Starr research fifty one participants acquainted with Mr. Starr’s inquiry acknowledged his employees legal professionals have spent hours this week and final wondering a number of present and previous White apartment aides with the intention to confirm even if Mr. Nelvis may have had the entry he defined in his testimony and will have witnessed a gathering among Mr. Clinton and Ms. Lewinsky. In his testimony earlier than the grand jury on Tuesday, former White condo aide George Stephanopoulos acknowledged, he was once puzzled by means of Mr. Starr’s legal professionals for almost an hour “about a ground plan of the 1st ground of the West Wing” of the White residence, the place the Oval workplace, the examine and the kitchen-pantry can be found. anyone accustomed to Mr. Stephanopoulos’s testimony acknowledged he proven that Mr. Nelvis did have the entry to the Oval place of work and the adjoining examine that he defined to the grand jury.